Quote:
Originally Posted by Nelson
|
"For those who were watching the games closely, I challenge you to identify who Canada relied upon to play a heavy, physical brand of hockey. Who were the most consistent play drivers offensively? Who would you identify as the transitional defenceman/play driver who attacked with and without the puck on a consistent basis?"
Great article, I agree with all of it, and this sentence stood out for me, because that is exactly how I felt: I was left wondering who the good players even were, who were the role guys, who were the good defenders, who were the PP guys and the go-to scorers?
The article goes on to say that Cameron seemed to try and balance every line and win by depth, but he achieved the opposite - this team had no identity and no game plan.