Quote:
Originally Posted by SebC
Actually yes, it's unreasonable. You're asking that they give up the only leverage they have for nothing. Reasonable would be releasing the hostages and recognizing Israel as part of a negotiated settlement.
|
So, taking civilians as hostages is reasonable negotiations tactic and demanding to release them unconditionally is unreasonable? Asking to drop the goal of destroying an existing state is unreasonable? I can hear this argument if we completely tear down any morals and look at it as a dirty fight for survival (which may well be correct). However, once you look at it this way, bombing out Gaza also becomes "reasonable" from Israel's perspective.
Quote:
|
It is both. The war is a one-sided beating.
|
Try to guess. When it was the last time there was a missile alert in Israel because of a rocket fired from Gaza?
Seven hours and 40 minutes ago, from the time of my post.
The proof:
https://t.me/PikudHaOref_all/18674
Gaza is still fighting. They are loosing, but they don't give up. The propaganda made it look as if Gaza is lying helplessly on the ground and Israel keeps beating it. So everyone is telling Israel to stop. This view is factually incorrect. It's not like Gaza quit and just technically didn't declare surrender. They are still actively fighting.