Quote:
Originally Posted by Goriders
So in a nutshell you are saying alt right conspiracies revolve around:
- WEF influencing or forming sovereign state policies
- vaccination rights
- climate change influence on policies
I guess how I would handle those issues since they have become very ideologically driven on both sides of the spectrum is being able to see through the dogma and make the best decisions based on the facts in hand rather than level of lobbying without trampling on people’s rights.
This in a nutshell is why being a political leader is one of the tougher jobs. No matter what decision is made 50% of the people will be unhappy. If you can find a path where both sides are moderately happy or moderately unhappy you have probably done your job. Almost impossible these days with all of the biased media platforms once again on both sides of the spectrum.
I would guess PP if elected will be taking a sharp turn on all three from what the liberals have been doing. Right or wrong I think the majority would agree that continuing down trudeau’s current path would not be a good strategy.. So there will definitely be change. There has to be.
But in my opinion canada has way bigger problems than those items. We are quickly lowering our standard of living by generating large amounts of debt via multiple avenues and sabotaging our industries abilities to generate revenues. If that doesn’t get addressed first none of the other items will really matter. Or they will certainly become less of a priority. That is probably going to be his main focus if he gets elected. At least that would be my guess from listening to him.
Hopefully I didn’t miss anything.
BTW I have no idea what sealioning is.
|
That's why the term was underlined - I provided a link so you wouldn't even have to Google it.
$50K debt per capita is not that important (and that's the total, and Poillievre promising tax cuts means he's unlikely to be able to do anything about it without massive service cuts). Drop the average condo price 10% from $500K to $450K and you've done about as much for young people as eliminating the national debt. And $50K of debt is even less important to a kid who dies from a preventable disease because Poillievre backed their moron parents' idiocy.
Maintaining an evidence-driven stance toward policy is far more important to me. If you don't have the right process for making decisions you have nothing. And it creates financial rewards. Carbon-taxes are evidence-based. Vaccinations are evidence based. Globalism is evidence-based. You say you would see through the dogma and make decisions based on facts on hand but the facts on hand support the Liberal position. The alt right positions Poillievre backs are based on fabrications. You say without trampling on people's rights but the most important right is the right to life (without it, no other right is relevant) and anti-vaxxers jeopardize that right. Meanwhile, Poillievre attacks trans people who aren't a threat to anyone, and the journalists who keep our politicians honest.
It's not the carbon tax that is killing investment in energy infrastructure. It's the moratoriums and regulatory delays and uncertainty. I do agree that it's a problem but I'm not sure even Poillievre would be willing and able to do anything about it in the face of resistance from the likes of BC and Quebec.