Quote:
Originally Posted by Roughneck
Well ####, that's what I get for just reading the press clippings rather than look at the maps. Why talking about the number of washrooms without context isn't helpful.
But I'd argue that saying the building has 24 washrooms is also disingenuous, as what a washroom is doesn't really have a standard. I don't think the two Flex Washrooms on the upper concourse with six toilets between them will have a significant effect on the dedicated men's washroom lines that have 18 urinals and 9 toilets each despite increasing the number of washrooms available to men by 100%.
Rogers Place and Scotia Place both have 8 washrooms on the main concourse, FWIW. Which is less than the Saddledome.
|
That’s because the Saddledome only has one actual concourse
But I don’t know if we can say what effect the flex washrooms will or won’t have. That’s around 15% of the capacity of one of those men’s washrooms. Would you think it’s better to increase capacity of the men’s washrooms by 15% instead of just moving that capacity elsewhere? I don’t necessarily.
And FWIW, I don’t know how you arrived at your numbers and I don’t know if we can judge the numbers just based on what’s here, but someone else said they counted 343 stalls/urinals on the concourse levels. That’s 21 more than Rogers Place when they were having their issues. And all they did was cram more urinals and sinks into the same washrooms.
I definitely don’t look at this and see an obvious, looming problem right now.