Quote:
Originally Posted by GGG
How do you differentiate between the argument you are making and the identical argument that a NIMBY in Lake Bonnevista would make.
What metrics are you using to justify your position that could be used to discredit the same but disingenuous argument made elsewhere?
|
The argument I was making is that there is not enough infrastructure in place to support that development. If there isn’t a fix for that, the project shouldn’t proceed. I don’t know anything about a proposal for Lake Bonavista (aside from the joke proposal I made in this thread for a multi-tower rental project, safe injection site and bottle depot to be developed on the current mall site!).
The interesting thing about the Glenmore Landing project, is that the bus lane that no one uses took away another entry point into Glenmore Landing. It’s one of the reasons that corner cannot be fixed now.
Anyway, like I’ve said before, I just assumed that this project was going ahead. I’m surprised it wasn’t passed, and frankly I would be surprised if it doesn’t come back again. I would imagine that Rio-Can is not pleased with this, and why wouldn’t they take another shot?