Quote:
Originally Posted by Slava
No, this is just people who don’t live anywhere near the development and won’t have to deal with the consequences, and they’re unsurprisingly in favour. The reality is this isn’t about preserving the character of the neighbourhood, or however else you want to characterize it. The site is not suitable for the additional people. We already have density in this area and that’s not what the problem is.
|
How do you differentiate between the argument you are making and the identical argument that a NIMBY in Lake Bonnevista would make.
What metrics are you using to justify your position that could be used to discredit the same but disingenuous argument made elsewhere?