Quote:
Originally Posted by Fuzz
As to the rest of your post, well ya, Biden didn't just pardon his son the day Trump was elected, he waited, and after the AG was announced(second one) who has an axe to grind with Biden, it's pretty obvious it would be politicized, unless you are one of those who believe politicians will moderate once in power. But that's dumb to believe because we know it isn't true. I think pretty much anyone facing the same situation would take along hard look at it, and come to the exact same conclusion Joe did. #### 'em. Don't take the risk with crazy. And these people are clearly crazy and don't believe in the rule of law, so why would you risk that with your son?
|
As a brother and father, I get it. That said, Hunter got himself in this mess. He was due to be sentenced before Trump was in office (December). So that means Joe would have been worried of further charges. Which Hunter was either guilty of, or not-guilty but due to the Justice department being influenceable by the president would see him convicted.
Think about that statement. Its basically saying Hunter gets off for criminal acts cause ol' pop thinks he's a good kid -and/or- the Justice Department is crooked and works for the president.
From a strictly political (again not court of law) lens this just sewered Dems with the general (non-hyper partisan) populace