Quote:
Originally Posted by bizaro86
Fair enough - it could be a coincidence that they independently edited it after they got called out for bias, although that seems unlikely to me.
The timing, however, seems irrefutable. Editing before publishing is one of the choices available to them, and they didn't.
|
I wonder how much the rush to publish affects workflows and how much scrutiny there is before the button hits. It’s unlikely that people who criticize the CBC editorial process want to fund a more robust editorial process.
I also think it’s unlikely that they kowtowed to pressure that hadn’t really hit the media.
So in my opinion this is this was brought to CBCs attention either internally or externally. It didn’t meet their journalistic standards and they fixed it. Essentially no intent.
So if that’s the case then the system as currently funded worked and isn’t really different then what we see from other news media in terms of releasing and editing as things progress.