Quote:
Originally Posted by CliffFletcher
Yeah, so hard that people like you basically don’t even try. Because bringing up immigration is coded as conservative. And if your whole online persona is built around being anti-conservative, you’ll just avoid the subject altogether and make dark implications about anyone who does.
But lots of non-conservative adults in the room* are talking about the problems generated by the unprecedented ramping up of immigration in the face of experts warning of its negative consequences. I mean, even the government that carried out the policies has acknowledged that it blew up in their faces.
If you don’t want the CPC to get into power, you should be especially angry about how badly the Liberals have handled the immigration brief, as it’s looking like it will hand Poilievre a majority. Though I suppose you could just chalk that up to the idiocy of the average Canadian, as a lot of posts around here do.
* I get most of my information on the subject from the Globe and Mail - that notorious den of populist far-right misinformation. Where do you get your news on the subject from, Pepsi?
|
This is a lot of hand waving to distract from the fact that your opinion was almost entirely formed and confidently declared despite not knowing anything about how Canada tracks exits, the current process surrounding temporary residents, how many visas expire in the average year, and how many temporary residents exist at any one time.
Care to re-evaluate your position on the knowledge you’ve been gifted or cite any sources for the information you, apparently, just made up to support your position?
Or you can keep ranting about how this is some anti-conservative thing, somethhing nobody has mentioned but you, in an effort to coddle some delicate intellectual ego that would seemingly be in danger by just admitting you didn’t know what you were talking about it at the outset.