Quote:
Originally Posted by SebC
But actually, it won't help "much". So it will help. And it won't save money because we're not going to deal with the supply crunch, but if we were to match supply to demand then it would. Economists understand that firing judges and reducing the need to hire more judges are both a reduction of tax spending on judge salaries from what they would otherwise be. If it instead reduces queues then it's an equivalent gain, but in the long run supply will have to exceed demand or the queue will become infinite.
Fookin' lawyers. You're picking at things that don't actually matter. T he spirit of what I said was correct. Which you probably know, but you're more concerned with being right than being fair. This is why nobody likes you. |
Not as far as judges go it isn't. It won't save a dime in taxes, and it will make no appreciable difference in wait times or lineups at the courthouse. Personal injury files take almost zero court time.