Quote:
Originally Posted by GioforPM
Your claim was that no fault would reduce the number of judges we pay for. They are overloaded, yes. This won't help much. And it won't save money because the same number of judges will exist.
|
But actually, it won't help
"much". So it
will help. And it won't save money because we're not going to deal with the supply crunch, but if we were to match supply to demand then it would. Economists understand that firing judges and reducing the need to hire more judges are both a reduction of tax spending on judge salaries from what they would otherwise be. If it instead reduces queues then it's an equivalent gain, but in the long run supply will have to exceed demand or the queue will become infinite.
Fookin' lawyers. You're picking at things that don't actually matter. The spirit of what I said was correct. Which you probably know, but you're more concerned with being right than being fair. This is why nobody likes you.