Quote:
Originally Posted by Fuzz
Nothing has been proven, though. That's evidence, not proof. And the proponents acting like you'd be an idiot if you don't believe it just confirms their smugness and inflexibility in their thinking, which means any conclusions they come to should also be treated as suspect.
|
Once something has been observed- and I'm specifically talking about the 2004 Nimitz encounter- continuing to doubt is illogical.
The "something" is the tic tac - a physical object demonstrating characteristics that should be impossible based on contemporary understanding.
"Observed" here by multiple independent sensors, each one the best we humans have for this type of observation and eyewitness, again the best we have for this kind of thing. Air track identification is critical, they train and train and then train some more to do this.
If one wanted to see what happens when particles smash into each other at near light speed, something like the large hadron collider would work well. And if one wanted to observe the flight characteristics of a 'UFO', like if we knew where and when one of these things would show up, a Nimitz class carrier battle group would be the best choice. With planes in the air piloted by senior officers and fitted with external targeting pods.
Sent from my SM-F741W using Tapatalk