View Single Post
Old 06-28-2007, 04:06 PM   #15
SeeGeeWhy
#1 Goaltender
 
SeeGeeWhy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by CaramonLS View Post
Maybe if they made phys ed not completely suck balls it would get the kids interested?

90% of the curriculum is Social Dance, Track and Field or Gymnastics. Oh man, those were fun times. I remember Line Dancing, hearing Achy Breaky heart played non-stop and Caddilac Ranch. Ugh.

Sports which actually get you up and moving more than Gymnastics or Dance - Like Floor hockey, basketball, football, rugby or Soccer... Try putting those into Phys Ed more and you might a) have a better grade and b) have more kids interested in it.

Seriously, I can count the number of times on my hand we played floor hockey, but linedancing? Way too much of that junk.
Yes, but you see this idea conflicts with a major philosophy in child education now a days:

THERE IS NO SUCH THING AS A WINNER OR A LOSER!

You can't have competition in sport anymore because everyone is worried about hurt feelings.

LAME.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by Biff View Post
If the NHL ever needs an enema, Edmonton is where they'll insert it.
SeeGeeWhy is offline   Reply With Quote