Quote:
Originally Posted by powderjunkie
Nitpicking, but the driver was just not egregiously wrong, and their overall behaviour in relation to the cyclist. That was ####ty driving.
|
He moved over. The DA’s office reviewed the video and found he did nothing wrong, which means they believed he gave at least the legal 3 ft. He did nothing to antagonize the cyclist in their confrontation and even the cyclist admitted he took out his frustration on this one individual that had been built up by previous incidents.
What more, realistically, would you have wanted him to do, and what more evidence would you have needed considering this is the world of the cyclist against the driver, the dash cam, and the decision of the DA after reviewing the evidence?
There’s nothing that points to “####ty” driving.