Quote:
Originally Posted by DownInFlames
Good idea to get a real lawyer to verify this. The crown can charge someone if the victim doesn't want them to, but I'd guess it's less likely because prosecution wouldn't be as successful without their cooperation.
|
Yes, crown decides on whether or not to pursue a case. Obviously victim cooperation is sometimes paramount for evidentiary purposes.
This happened to the LA Kings Defenceman who was charged with domestic assault. The wife didnt want to pursue but the prosecutors had enough evidence (and the ability) to charge and convict without her cooperation -- if i remember correctly.
The victim here also has a potential civil law suit in this case, which i imagine she will be pursuing against the office. I wouldnt be surprised if her lawyer attempts to loop in the Police as well under vicarious liability or negligence to ensure his/her client gets paid - i am not sure if there are any statutory issues at play here though.
TBH, i havent been following the whole thing, so i might have details wrong