Quote:
Originally Posted by PepsiFree
For one, we’re talking about Hezbollah.
Two, people (as defined in this document article) are not objectives. They can be, but for the purpose of this document, “military objectives” refers to objects, not people. You could argue that the pages are a military objectives.
Three, read paragraph two in the article, which I already bolded, as not violating one paragraph in the article doesn’t mean they didn’t violate the law. That’s not how this works.
You are weird!
That’s not what Flames Fan was referring to, and you’re free to look up the dozens of articles talking about Israel’s role in this, the off-record US officials that claim Israel took responsibility, and the other bits of “common sense” you were talking about to decide for yourself.
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by PepsiFree
It’s especially weird that you’re only saying it wasn’t Israel (after crediting Israel with it initially), once the possibility of it being illegal was raised.
|
None of this matters if you don't have proof!
So you can also read other posters minds? Great talent you have!
Really simple question Pepsid! Do you have proof? Yes or No? Its not a debate. If you have proof post it!
I could not prove Flames Fan Phd was wrong and admitted it. Why cant you?
Unless you have proof.
Either post proof or shut up.
If you have proof post it!