View Single Post
Old 09-19-2024, 08:35 AM   #4356
You Need a Thneed
Voted for Kodos
 
You Need a Thneed's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by GGG View Post
https://pub-calgary.escribemeetings....umentId=131775

Read through the assessment report. I still dont think they made the correct decision at the time with the information in the report. The North LRT south BRT is better yet in the ranking they hammer it. It was 1 billion cheaper at the time and because of the limited tunnel and bridge scope (bridge ran down center st).

One egregious example of a plain to see error is in the Cost section for A2 they say the north segment will cost 8 million per year and the south section will cost 28 million per year opex. (A2 is 16th to Shepard B1 is North BRT / South BRT). Then for B1 the operation costs for North BRT is 56 million. Based on the alignments those costs should be in the same ballpark. It appears they didn’t include the costs for the existing North BRT system in the considerations.

This is a report written to justify a selection it is not a dispassionate evaluation.
Setting aside which route is better / cheaper - a big part of the reasoning why the SE was chosen is because Councilor Chu was actively against the LRT going to his ward, and Councilor Keating was the biggest supporter for the project.
__________________
My LinkedIn Profile.
You Need a Thneed is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to You Need a Thneed For This Useful Post: