Quote:
Originally Posted by powderjunkie
Why are previous reviews relevant?
Province was okay with 16th-Shephard with a huge tunnel for ~4.5B
Province was okay* with 16th-Shephard with a shorter tunnel for 4.9B
Province was okay with Eau Clair-Shephard for 5.5B
*after a bunch of ####ery around then tbf
Turns out province was not okay with Eau Clair-Lynnwood for 6.3B.
|
They're relevant because so much of the current discussion is about the earlier decisions made that set the scope and layout of the project. If these so-called obvious problems in the methodology of choosing the alignment type were so obvious, why didn't the province raise the red flag then?