I find this conversation a bit weird. This is a situation where we pretty much knew how this happened from the beginning because the killer admitted to it and all the information we’ve learned since has just confirmed what we already knew.
He was a reckless driver with road rage issues who was also impaired due to alcohol. Pretending he wasn’t impaired is really strange. And pretending this is actually a lesson about how cyclists are annoying but we still shouldn’t run them over is also strange? Like, he was impaired and angry at the car in front of him so he passed on the right and didn’t see the cyclists in time. He wasn’t some sober rage-head who ran down cyclists because he was mad at them.
|