Quote:
Originally Posted by Winsor_Pilates
Even if the number of attacks drops significantly, a repeat offender with 60+ police encounters and multiple assault charges being free to do this will always be a problem.
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Winsor_Pilates
It's right beside where I said you can keep people in prison forever. Make up silly things, completely avoid the event, show your true motivations.
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Winsor_Pilates
"The chief said the man has previous convictions for assault and assault causing bodily harm and was on probation for a 2023 assault when he attacked the two men Wednesday."
Of Course
|
Okay, so elaborate on what you're saying above with these posts. If the person has previous convictions but has served their sentence, etc., what should be done with them to mitigate recidivism?
Was the "of course" just to illustrate your lack of surprise that the dude had priors? Not exactly an earth-shattering revelation. Most violent criminals have priors.
Again, in the context of what the criminal code, the Charter, legal precedent, etc., stipulate, how do you think repeat offenders should be handled differently?
Quote:
|
Never have you shown any concern for victims; always rushing straight to a political angle.
|
Spare me the faux moral outrage. I'm not the one using a tragedy to push a political narrative.
At least I actually brainstorm ideas for how to improve the justice, not to mention work and volunteer in fields that seek to improve mental health access, which would likely reduce these types of incidents.
What do you do besides piss, moan, and pearl-clutch on the internet?