Quote:
Originally Posted by Firebot
https://globalnews.ca/video/10730018...kers-shameful/
Singh criticizes Trudeau’s imposition of binding arbitration on rail workers: ‘Shameful’ while surrounded by NDPers with "NDP stands with workers" t-shirts.
He claims this to be a line in the sand crossed. Then he proceeds to say there will be an election a year from now seconds later as if he can do nothing about it. Doesn't seem like a line was crossed. How many lines in the sand has it been now? It's become a running joke.
https://www.theglobeandmail.com/poli...its-invisible/
|
I’m kinda doubting that there is any scenario where ending their supply and confidence agreement today would result in the binding arbitration order being rescinded. So basically as it relates to helping workers Singh has a choice between waiting for the election next year or forcing one sooner where the party that is likely going to win would be able to implement any anti-labour legislation they’re planing on passing a year earlier. Don’t get me wrong, I wish he would have told the liberals that based on the circumstances(collusion) he would have ended the agreement if they forced both companies back to work when they did and actually stuck to it.
See why it’d be nice if the CPC moderated their policy stance on certain matters from openly hostile to even just neutral? The NDP would be in a position where they’d have no choice but to do it because enough of their supporters would be on board.