Quote:
Originally Posted by blankall
Lol. You literally said it was justified because Israel wasn't letting in anesthetic. Your timeline is wrong, as the abduction happened before Israel's assault. You got busted making things up to justify Hamas' actions.
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by blankall
So they left him with an open bullet wound for days? Uhhh that's worse than not using anesthetic.
Why are you defending Hamas abducting and torturing a Bedouin.
This is pretty simple folks. Just admit that Hamas did bad.
|
You’re the guy who justified the bombing of World Kitchen, right? You know… the charity?
Right.
So, as desperate as you are to “bust” someone, maybe grow up, stop trying to play stupid games, and pipe down.
Here’s what
I actually said:
Quote:
Originally Posted by PepsiFree
His treatment overall sounds terrible, but if you’re taking issue with the surgery, that seems somewhat backwards? They performed surgery with anaesthesia they didn’t have access to.
Would you have preferred they leave the bullet in or let him die? Genuinely asking. Not even suggesting they should get credit but like… why is that the thing you’re sticking on and not… you know… the murder?
|
Acknowledging the treatment was terrible, saying the murder they committed was worse than them performing surgery without anesthesia.
Or… you disagree? You think they weren’t terrible but just “bad” and that the surgery was worse than murder? Or you agree with what I said and you’d like to apologise?
Really weird take.