Quote:
Originally Posted by ThisIsAnOutrage
I saw some of it. It wasn't a train wreck, but pretty uninspired. Harris' answers sounded like broad approaches to goals/government but didn't really amount to policy IMO. Amd it was a tame interview, felt like it had training wheels on it.
If votes Pres. she will have to do much better or get eaten alive.
|
IMO, calling the interview "tame", "boring", or "uninspiring" is a huge win for Harris in particular and bringing the temperature down politically.
Politics needs to be boring. The general public can go live their lives rather than obsess over politics. The excitement can be generated at the rallies in various towns. This is important to ensure people don't get complacent.
It's a win for her, cos she didn't come off as senile or make any gaffs. There wasn't any fodder for the opposition to latch on to. Her emphasis about how she always governed according to her values was great. It showed consistency. As opposed to Trump, who repeats what he heard last. Does he think the six week abortion is too short? His campaign already trying to walk that back.