Quote:
Originally Posted by stemit14
Exactly. So it may take the flames overpaying to get him. I mentioned Andersson + Coleman (50% retained) for Tij Iginla. But in reality, the age of those players would make it so they are likely not interested. It might take including a prospect from the flames like Honzek as well.
It’s likely a moot point as you said… teams just don’t trade their top prospect unless they are forced to.
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jiri Hrdina
Arizona asks for Zayne.
|
Utah literally just traded Geekie who was an 11th overall pick that would be very comparable to Iginla.
Geekie + Moser + 2nd for Sergachev. Main difference between Sergachev and Andersson is 2 years vs 7 years...but Andersson's 2 years are way more affordable.
That's what type of return you're aiming for with Andersson.
Last Three Seasons:
Andersson:
Age: 27
GP: 239
5V5 TOI: 4164
5V5 TOI/GP: 17:25
xGF: 52.3%
GF%: 53.4%
5v5 G: 15
5v5 P: 73
Total TOI/GP: 23:30
Total G: 24
Total P: 138
Hits: 149
Shots Blocked: 423
Sergachev:
Age: 26
GP: 191
5V5 TOI: 3387
5V5 TOI/GP: 17:44
xGF: 52.39
GF%: 50.3%
5v5 G: 13
5v5 P : 68
Total TOI/GP: 23:01
Total G: 19
Total P: 121
Hits: 297
Shots Blocked: 155
Not sure you're going to find a better comparable in terms of what type of trade return you'd be hoping to get for Andersson.
Should add that I don't see Utah trading Iginla - but just flagging there is precedent of a similar type of deal there. I'd argue the Geekie + Moser + 2nd is potentially more valuable than Iginla. It's more just unlikely that teams trade their more recent 1st rounders...need to be looking at 2021-2023 1st rounders as those are more likely to move.