Quote:
Originally Posted by worth
And PS, I never once said in this thread that I believed the so called conspiracy theory. Personally I think the argument is up for debate. I suppose by most of your responses, there should be no debate, and those that would consider an alternative theory are all completly braindead. All i've heard here is how conspiracy theorists disregard anything that doesn't apply to their side of the story. Perhaps the other side is doing the same?
|
The conspiracy theories are on par with "intelligent design." With both theories, it is possible to make arguments in favour of one's position, but the arguments are invariably specious, circumstantial, or just factually incorrect. Conspiracy theorists do not deserve anything more than mockery, and are incapable of having a debate.
When there is ONE single, irrefutable piece of evidence that the 9/11 attacks comprised anything other than 19 nutjobs, 4 passenger jets, and a lot of institutional errors, I'll give you the time of day. So far, I'm still waiting.