Quote:
Originally Posted by dissentowner
I don't mind if someone disagrees, it would be nice though if people gave legit reasons why Huska has shown any sign as a pro coach of being a good one. Saying he did a good job coaching a roster that had all the ingredients of a playoff team to start the season into a sell off and rebuild is a positive for the rebuild crowd but certainly doesn't indicate a capable coach.
|
Huska has been at it one year and followed in sutters footsteps. To expect he would have gotten amazing results in year one with a team that Sutter couldn't get into the post season seems like a really hard bar to clear. It's possible the team just wasn't very good, Sutter got everything he could out of them and the front office belatedly came to this conclusion as well and dismantled the team.
Alternatively, you could be right. Maybe Sutter wasn't that good and the roster was decent. In which case Huska underperformed. But that doesn't explain why the front office tore it down rather than replace Huska.