Quote:
Originally Posted by ThePrince
And I think you have some great posts and insights, which I genuinely enjoy reading. I just don’t understand how you call my comments desperate and weird, said I’m “crying”, “don’t have a sense of humour” and then just play it off as you making jokes and humorous comments. That’s a lot more than poking the bear and in any good fun. Which is a shame because I really do think you have some great opinions and are worthwhile to listen to when you’re not constantly putting others down with gotcha posts.
|
If we’re keeping score, before I called you desperate and weird you:
- said I was being disingenuous
- suggested I don’t practice nuanced thinking
- said I ignore facts that don’t suit me
- said I don’t know anything about the Canadian Energy landscape
- suggested I believe context is never important and that I don’t know what intelligent discourse entails
All in response to an offhand remark, telling you to “take the L,” and then saying I agreed with you and to tell me what wasn’t a fact lol.
Normally I would just let these little mini-scoldings go, but at what point am I allowed to respond in kind?
It seems to be a trait amongst certain types of people here to cry foul when they take a shot and then the heat goes up to a degree they don’t like and suddenly I’m the #######. And to be fair, I don’t mind being the #######, but you want to be the first one to take some responsibility for how this back and forth went or just “nah, it must be all you” like them?
I don’t care man, but if you think you didn’t deserve anything by calling an offhand remark (that you later admitted was factual) me being “disingenuous” and “ignoring the facts” then I can’t help you. Go #### on iggyoi some more or something, he’s nicer about it.
Now someone post something critical of skippy so we can all laugh at people freaking out about it already. Or rename it the CalgaryPuck Politics Thread.