Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community - View Single Post - Purdue computer simulation of 9/11 attacks

Burninator · 06-21-2007, 04:56 PM

I haven't heard about the wierd flight pattern, that doesn't really point to misdoings imo. But some things that never made sense to me are:

The hole in the pentagon is a lot smaller than a plane. The wings would do a lot of damage too. Same with the tail. That should have taken down part of the roof, but it didn't appear to.

It didn't go very far into the building. The planes that hit the towers had damage go out the other side. Now speed of the planes could be a factor here.

I've also heard that there isn't any plane wreckage. This just what I've heard, there very well could be a couple tons of it recovered.

Lack of video. How such a high security building have one terrible angle of the impact? A angle that doesn't show anything outside of an explosion. It could be that they haven't released it, but I don't see any reason why they wouldn't.

Still none of these things point to a conspiracy, but some of them I wouldn't mind seeing answers to.

EDIT: I wouldn't be surprised to see answers for everyone of these points, as I am sure some of these videos on the internet that talk about 9/11 leave information out to make their theory work.

06-21-2007, 04:56 PM	#24
Burninator Franchise Player Join Date: Dec 2003 Exp:	I haven't heard about the wierd flight pattern, that doesn't really point to misdoings imo. But some things that never made sense to me are: The hole in the pentagon is a lot smaller than a plane. The wings would do a lot of damage too. Same with the tail. That should have taken down part of the roof, but it didn't appear to. It didn't go very far into the building. The planes that hit the towers had damage go out the other side. Now speed of the planes could be a factor here. I've also heard that there isn't any plane wreckage. This just what I've heard, there very well could be a couple tons of it recovered. Lack of video. How such a high security building have one terrible angle of the impact? A angle that doesn't show anything outside of an explosion. It could be that they haven't released it, but I don't see any reason why they wouldn't. Still none of these things point to a conspiracy, but some of them I wouldn't mind seeing answers to. EDIT: I wouldn't be surprised to see answers for everyone of these points, as I am sure some of these videos on the internet that talk about 9/11 leave information out to make their theory work.