Quote:
Originally Posted by Burninator
The WTC 7 I would like to know more about as well as the pentagon. There are things about both of those that don't seem to add up. But I won't jump on the conspiracy bandwagon until I see real evidence or at least a compelling case. Just because all the details aren't there, doesn't mean there is a conspiracy. The leap to that doesn't make sense in my mind.
|
Basically. This is what I want as well. I have no problem believing how two massive planes can blow up the two buildings.
I don't understand how WTC 7 fell (yes, a simulation and scientific data would help).
And the pentagon was weird because I don't like how they released file footage of the plane hitting it, but even though it is a state of the art facility, the best picture we can get is extremely grainy, blurry, and about 1 FPS. It just feels like there's something to hide.
Also, it was extremely weird that the plane had a direct angle on high ranking officers' offices (the front), but it made a 270 degree turn at extremely low altitude to hit the only part of the pentagon that was renovated to resist a direct impact. Also this happened to be in a storage room with very few people working there at the time.
Conspiracy? Naw, I just want more data to satiate myself.