The scientists that claim something else caused the attack always seem to be focused on one thing, and one thing alone. Like the guy with the thermite (or whatever it is). Where as this study takes a multitude of scientists from several disciplines and produces a finding.
And I am not going to believe some internet nerd who has pieced together youtube videos and uncovered a conspiracy. Gimme a break. Or some quote of a guy saying "we had to pull the building." That could mean anything, especially when you take it out of context.
The WTC 7 I would like to know more about as well as the pentagon. There are things about both of those that don't seem to add up. But I won't jump on the conspiracy bandwagon until I see real evidence or at least a compelling case. Just because all the details aren't there, doesn't mean there is a conspiracy. The leap to that doesn't make sense in my mind.
|