[Bring_Back_Shantz]

Originally Posted by worth

One thing we need to consider is that there are structural engineers, physicists and other academics on the opositeside of the argument as well. It's not like 100% of the scientists are on one side, and only crazy people in their basement on the computer are on the other side.

Also one other thing to conisider is that, from what I can see anyway, these people are examinimg the collapse of WTC 1 and 2, while WTC 7 also collapsed that day which wasn't hit by a plane. I think that's the kicker for most people who are skeptacle.

I'd really like to see some links to CREDIBLE scientists who have actually shown that the planes could not have caused the collapses.

As for WTC 7. I for one do not think it is so far fetched that it is possible that two 100 storey buildings collapsing across the street from another builging could possibly cause severe structural damage to that other building.