Quote:
Originally Posted by Slava
I'm just so happy to see Fuzz making the case for less development because I know in other threads he thinks that I should accept development!
|
At least I'm consistent, eh
Quote:
Originally Posted by Fuzz
Sliver, part of it is you have no understanding of the history of Canmore, and seem to have no interest in understanding it. The very reason Canmore is how it is now is because it has been continually railroaded by outsiders who promise one thing and do another. Their isn't housing for residents because those lies are never followed though.
|
Are you sure your understanding of history has come from reliable narrators?
Developers failing to follow through on the grand visions they present is not a unique problem. It's up to councils and planning depts to include teeth in their codes and approval proccesses.
As for the outsiders, I've already mentioned that Spring Creek is an inside job. That's gotta the most central big development by far.
Do you have any ideas how things could be better? Maybe some sort of fairly aggressive vacancy tax? Everyone has to report to a checkpoint and show their papers every other Wednesday? (I'm only half joking)