Quote:
Originally Posted by Bingo
Someone suggested Vladar wasn't very good and you introduced wins to defend him.
Wasn't the point only Vladar isn't/wasn't very good?
Seems to me the topic hasn't changed. You introduced wins to defend him, but don't like GSAA as a measure.
I've always agreed that GSAA (and other stats) are flawed, but wins certainly wouldn't top GSAA in my pecking order.
As it stands I think GSAA and GSAx are the best of the bunch until something better comes along.
|
And this is where I disagree with you. A bad stat is worse than no stat, because when a stat is presented, it is assumed to be expressing information. But if that information is flawed, quoting the stat provides negative value.