Quote:
Originally Posted by Sliver
Not to belittle you or anything, Fuzz, but this is what I'm talking about guys. Try to pave a path and locals don't like it. They want nothing new. No improvements. Always a reason why change = bad. Anywhere else a paved path is an improvement, right? Not there, man. They'll make signs, they'll protest...it's madness.
|
Not really. Many areas are more well suited to gravel or natural earth. Like your favourite place, Nose Hill! Seriously though, not every path needs to be paved, or is better for it. Not every improvement is actually an improvement. Was putting a golf course where people used to bike and hike an improvement? Not for people who don't like golfing. I'm not sure why you find it so hard to see why some changes have strong negative effects on those that used to be able to use the areas, and now can't. It seems pretty logical to me.