Quote:
Originally Posted by GGG
There is no test case here.
Any candidate with the backing of Biden and the rest of the democratic leadership falling inline would likely have had a similar magnitude of released funding.
I think you are seeing the enthusiasm from going from 0% to a 25-40% chnance of winning. (Assuming Harris performs like a generic democrat).
So the question of weak candidate relative to the other 5 or 6 names thrown around is entirely unrelated to the restored enthusiasm post Biden debate and raised a pile of money.
So yes weak candidates replacing dead candidates with the full endorsement of the party after no money was raised for 3 weeks can raise 100 million.
I’m not saying she is a weak candidate just this is not evidence of her not being a weak candidate. We will see in two weeks once the polling digests her taking over. If she doesn’t match or exceed the generic democrat ballot she would be a weak candidate.
|
If you mean the down ballot Democrats, fine. If you mean "unnamed potential candidate", nah.