Voters voted for Biden/Harris knowing the 2nd person is going to take over for the first in the event the first can't fulfill their duties, so you could more plausibly argue that Harris is the only person that has any democratic support for being the candidate.
Anyone else would be the party putting in someone no one voted for.
Sure if you replayed the timeline there's probably people that would do better in November than Harris will but they would be even less "democratic" if that's the criteria.
I mean Bernie Sanders would result in the most entertaining campign, that's my criteria.
__________________
Uncertainty is an uncomfortable position.
But certainty is an absurd one.
|