Quote:
Originally Posted by Cecil Terwilliger
Wanna post the real breakdown or point out his errors?
|
The $537 is being counted twice, for starters. Why not throw it in some random medium term bucket as well, really make that red ink sing. Wait, the $330M is also counted twice. Hmm. The community sports payments seem to be missing from the Flames long term costs. And the loan payment amount seems to be off by $11M as well.
At a cursory glance.
He pulled the same misleading #### on the last deal too. It's totally fine that he's against the deal, I don't blame him. But it's not hard to put up accurate figures that still paint the picture he wants from his quick Excel snip.
EDIT: Wait, he didn't pull the same misleading #### on the last deal too. He just recycled the same haphazard Excel snip he made a year ago for more imaginary internet points on Reddit.