Quote:
Originally Posted by GioforPM
Yes, and I think that the long term Tkachuk signing would have involved (a) a price bigger than a lot of people here would have agreed with at the time and (b) would not have been anything like 8 years. People were already thinking the $9M QO was rich for what Tkachuk had done to that point. (around a 70 point pace more or less). I think a new deal would have been 5 years at $10M.
|
I know we have no idea, but I think he would have signed for 8 years if the money was right (say $9.5M), as the Tkachuk's always took the money if offered. Tkachuk was liking Calgary at that time.