Quote:
Originally Posted by butterfly
Interesting claim. Any evidence?
How could anyone be "injury prone" if they're random?
|
It is you that is using terms and phrases like 'injury consistency', 'durability is a skill', and 'more likely to be injured'. All of these require evidence for the claim. Stating that injuries are random does not require evidence - the opposite requires evidence.
You understand statistics and randomness, so I'm not sure why this is challenging for you.