Quote:
Originally Posted by GioforPM
You don't need an assault for an action for unauthorized sharing of a sex video. It's a crime and a tort without the assault. I think you'd name a team official in order to rope the team into the lawsuit.
I doubt a prosecutor would act as far as making someone an accessory after the fact for the reasons I said before.
|
What I am saying is you need the sex video.
The person counselling the deletion of said sex video has minimal civil risk, if any at all.
The only way they would be liable is if their counselling of deletion caused the original civil case (assault or unauthorised showing of the sex video) to fail.
If that happened, the Plaintiff would still need to establish the original case (unauthorised showing of a sex video) was more likely than not to be provable had the video not been deleted, in order to be successful as against the party which counselled the deletion.
This then more likely than not brings the original act of unauthorised showing of the sex video back in, rendering the case against the counsellor of the deletion moot, as there are no damages...