Quote:
Originally Posted by IamNotKenKing
This particular action would not go very far.
I would probably name them as well, just to cover my butt, but the likelihood of being successful against them in any material amount is slim.
Damages would likely only flow from the party who instructed the deletion of the video if the action against the taker of the video failed due to insufficient evidence, being the video...
You'd still have to establish the factual scenario of the original assault having occurred, which gets the first party back on.
|
You don't need an assault for an action for unauthorized sharing of a sex video. It's a crime and a tort without the assault. I think you'd name a team official in order to rope the team into the lawsuit.
I doubt a prosecutor would act as far as making someone an accessory after the fact for the reasons I said before.