Quote:
Originally Posted by GioforPM
You don't have to "know" anything, and assault isn't even necessary. It is illegal to share videos of consensual sex unless both parties agree.Common sense runs against there being some sort of full consent, especially in this circumstance, where Daigle has run down from the room and said "look what just happened".
People might not get charged if they advised out of ignorance, because prosecutors don't charge everyone with everything possible. But if this girl had sued, she could also sue the people who advised to delete evidence.
|
This particular action would not go very far.
I would probably name them as well, just to cover my butt, but the likelihood of being successful against them in any material amount is slim.
Damages would likely only flow from the party who instructed the deletion of the video if the action against the taker of the video failed due to insufficient evidence, being the video...
You'd still have to establish the factual scenario of the original assault having occurred, which gets the first party back on.