View Single Post
Old 07-10-2024, 12:31 PM   #35
Red Slinger
First Line Centre
 
Red Slinger's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Funkhouser View Post
My tiers are as follows:

(1) likely elite NHLers - Parekh
(2) NHLers, potentially elite - Wolf, Coronato
(3) potentially NHLers, potentially elite in their roles - Pelletier, Brz, Stromgren, Grushnikov, Suniev, Poirier, Soloyov, Klapka
(4) potentially NHLers, potentially elite in their roles, but unproven since drafted - Morin, Mews, Basha, Gridin, Battaglia, Misa, Honzek, Jurmo, Hurtig, Sergeev, Lipinski,
(5) potentially NHL tweeners - Morton, Ciona, Schwindt

This isn't necessarily how I will vote though as some unproven players have more upside potential than future role players.
I like our prospects and appreciate your enthusiasm, but almost all of these guys are unproven. There have been lots of Robbie Schremps (600 goals, 1300 points) get no more than a cup of coffee in the NHL despite having great showings in junior or even the minors.

I think Parekh has the highest ceiling of the bunch but for all we know he'll turn out to be a one-dimensional, power-play specialist like Bouchard (who I would hardly call elite).

Wolf could be great. But then again he has a kinda similar pedigree to John Gillies. So, goalie-voodoo stuff.

If Coronato was elite, he'd likely already have a full time job in the NHL like Bedard. I think his ceiling is much more likely a regular in the top 6.

The rest listed are even more unproven and statically are more likely to never have a full time NHL role than they are to being elite at anything on the ice.

I hope I'm wrong and you're right, but all this hype and unrealistic expectations will probably only lead to disappointment.
Red Slinger is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Red Slinger For This Useful Post: