Kind of weird takes by angry people in this thread. I'm simply pointing out that changing the funding mechanism to a well funded operation probably has zero impact on the operations. The assumption being that it continues to be properly funded.
Can someone explain to me while Legal Aid Alberta - a non-profit largely funded by the government - has such a giant reserve? And why doesn't that large reserve suggest that perhaps the funding model needs to be revised? And why does a government looking into that get labeled poorly?
I don't really get it beyond the idea that people in this thread are super ideological and are just applying manufactured rage to the topic de jour.
|