Quote:
Originally Posted by SuperMatt18
To me it's still weird...if you aligned on the $$ then aligning on term should have been easy if it was 1 or 2 years.
In the end though I do get why the Flames would be hesitant to go beyond 1 year....but if 2 years keeps the asset then I would have done that. And vice versa for Kylington, I don't get why you'd risk the scenario you're in now to try to push for a second year.
Seems completely avoidable overall.
|
Zero reason for the Flames to go 2 years and it isnt much of an asset. At 2x3 it might be a negative asset