Part of me feels like to simplify going forward we should just always do it by age.
Best players 23 and under or something like that...I always find more value in those lists than the lists that try to define prospects as graduated or not and it leads to inconsistency.
(I know this would break the historical list standard but to me feels like it's the better way)
Last edited by SuperMatt18; 07-04-2024 at 01:33 PM.
|