[rubecube]

Originally Posted by Firebot

Ironic that you decide to point this out after you realized no one would spar with you on your deflection bait? Guess we know your intentions?

The thesis of your post was essentially "Anything the Liberals do is automatically supported by the NDP because of the supply and confidence agreement," which is barely a high-school level of political analysis. That said, it was not a good look for Singh to come out against the binding arbitration.

I also had started to post to reply a yours that Poilievre has done this on several occasions in the past, using Margaret Thatcher's definition, and I don't get his tactic of doing such obvious troll baiting when he doesn't need to do it when leading the polls by so much. It may turn off swing voters and not move the voting needle.

Classifying it as troll-baiting diminishes what it actually is, which is fascist dog-whistling. Do you think PP is a fascist, or is he just playing one on TV?

Yet look how upset you are that people are discussing Trudeau skipping on the stampede instead of "WHAT ABOUT PP"?

I couldn't give a flying #### whether any of the leaders show up to these useless photo ops. I tend to think courting fascists is a much more pressing issue.

Speaking of irony, since it was posted before your deflection attempt, and got zero replies from Liberal / NDP supporters: what are your thoughts about Saijan?

He's an idiot and should have been replaced years ago.

It's not a deflection. I've been very consistently critical of the Liberal party for the better part of a decade. My argument has consistently been that if your solution to your issues with the Liberals is to install a fascist or someone who courts fascists, you have very little moral high ground in this debate.