Quote:
Originally Posted by SuperMatt18
So let's assume they were aligned at $2.0M and the sticking point is 1 or 2 years...personally I think the extra year is pretty low risk with decent upside and it's worth going to 2 years to keep the asset (which would be a very tradeable asset if he plays well).
|
Again, they signed him to a 2 year contract last time and then he didn't play a game for a year and a half immediately after signing that contract.
Why would the Flames do that again?
The line in the sand was clearly a one year deal, no exceptions. And for good reason based off of what just happened.