Quote:
Originally Posted by Scroopy Noopers
I don’t recall anyone saying it was over retention. It was due to lack of assets coming back for said retention.
|
Maybe we are splitting hairs here and that the required assets for the rumored trade were not enough to justify the retention? Or ownership balked at paying salary for 2+ years even though though the deal was somewhat completed.
After comments like Marky made and needing him to waive, they were out of options.
https://newjerseyhockeynow.com/2024/...oogle_vignette
Regardless of the issue and getting back to Oliver Kylington. This is about money, term and being able to fulfill his role as a full time NHL player. Clearly there is a difference of opinion on that from both sides