Quote:
Originally Posted by TherapyforGlencross
So this ruling is bad as it looks, right? Can someone explain it to me, it appears that the president can do wherever they want with no repercussions? They could also classify everything they do as presidential actions, so they aren’t tried for personal actions? Does this ruling override constitutional amendments?
|
Basically what this ruling really says, is if you're supporters are the people they feel team allegiance with, they will drag out and proceeding to help you stall for as long as possible, and chip away at the charges until they don't really properly encompass the crime itself. But that they want to re-litigate each individual instance to make sure that if you are not on the team they let the charges go ahead, because if a democrat does it it's not official.